ZKsync vs Ethereum Scalability
Real-time TPS
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum TPS is 19.64 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum max TPS is 62.34 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum max theoretical TPS is 119.1 tx/s
Transaction Volume
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum transaction volume is 70,718 txns
Block Time
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum block time is 12.04s
Finality
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum finality is 12m 48s
Type
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum was launched on Jul 30, 2015
ZKsync vs Ethereum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum Nakamoto Coefficient is 2
Validators/Miners
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum has 1,082,000 validators
Stake/Hashrate
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum stake is $151.8B
Consensus Mechanism
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum is PoS
Governance
ZKsync has no data, while Ethereum governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
ZKsync Comparisons
About Blockchains
About ZKsync
ZKsync is a Layer-2 scaling solution that makes transactions on Ethereum cheaper and faster by utilizing zero-knowledge rollups (zk-rollups) and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs).
About Ethereum
Ethereum emerges as a decentralized, open-source blockchain platform empowering developers to craft and deploy smart contracts alongside dApps. Pioneering the smart contract concept, Ethereum enables self-executing agreements with terms directly encoded into its blockchain, eliminating the need for intermediaries. Additionally, Ethereum serves as a hub for the creation and exchange of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) and various digital assets. Its intrinsic cryptocurrency, Ether (ETH), facilitates network transactions and incentivizes miners to uphold network security. Ethereum's evolution to Ethereum 2.0 introduces a proof-of-stake (PoS) mechanism, aiming to enhance scalability and energy efficiency.