- Compare
- Ethereum vs Arbitrum
Ethereum vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Ethereum TPS is 59.25% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Ethereum max TPS is 95.41% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Ethereum max theoretical TPS is 99.7% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Ethereum transaction volume is 59.25% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Ethereum block time is 48X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Ethereum finality is 7.24% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Ethereum is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Ethereum was launched 6 years before Arbitrum
Ethereum vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Ethereum Nakamoto Coefficient is 2X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Ethereum has 1,086,780X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Ethereum stake is $139.9B, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Ethereum is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Ethereum off-chain governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Ethereum vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Ethereum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Ethereum
Ethereum emerges as a decentralized, open-source blockchain platform empowering developers to craft and deploy smart contracts alongside dApps. Pioneering the smart contract concept, Ethereum enables self-executing agreements with terms directly encoded into its blockchain, eliminating the need for intermediaries. Additionally, Ethereum serves as a hub for the creation and exchange of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) and various digital assets. Its intrinsic cryptocurrency, Ether (ETH), facilitates network transactions and incentivizes miners to uphold network security. Ethereum's evolution to Ethereum 2.0 introduces a proof-of-stake (PoS) mechanism, aiming to enhance scalability and energy efficiency.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.