- Compare
- Robonomics vs Polygon
Robonomics vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon TPS is 61.77 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 222,370 txns
Block Time
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Robonomics vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon nakamoto coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon has 103 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon stake is 3.514B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Robonomics has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
Robonomics Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Robonomics
The creation and development of a platform that provides tools for working with the robot economy network (briefly - the Robonomics platform) will allow designers of new cities and industrial zones to build trust among the autonomous robots services, provide direct user access for ordering products from autonomous factories and services of urban sensor networks. This in turn will allow us to put in place a decentralized system that globally monitors the activities of cyber physical systems.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.