Compare Rayls vs Arbitrum

Rayls vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 27.46 tx/s

R
Arbitrum logo
27.46 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s

R
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s

R
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 98.9K txns

R
Arbitrum logo
98.9K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

R
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

R
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

R
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.68B total transactions

R
Arbitrum logo
1.68B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

R
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Rayls vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

R
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

R
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Rayls and Arbitrum have no data

R
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

R
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

R
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Rayls vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,331 developers

R
Arbitrum logo
2,331

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum has 128 repos

R
Arbitrum logo
128

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum has 188,671 commits

R
Arbitrum logo
188,671

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,446 stars

R
Arbitrum logo
10,446

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,619 watchers

R
Arbitrum logo
1,619

Data from Chainspect

Rayls vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $36.74K

R
Arbitrum logo
$36.74K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.01298

R
Arbitrum logo
$0.01298

Data from Chainspect

Price

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.3004

R
Arbitrum logo
$0.3004

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Rayls has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.655B

R
Arbitrum logo
$1.655B

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Rayls

Rayls is the most compliant blockchain infrastructure that enables real-world asset (RWAs) tokenisation, CBDCs, cross-border payments and access to regulated liquidity on public chain.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Rayls Socials

Arbitrum Socials