Lisk vs Arbitrum
Lisk vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 16.42 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 59,123 txns
Block Time
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Lisk vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Lisk and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Lisk Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Lisk
Lisk is a Layer 2 blockchain boosting Web3 adoption in emerging markets on Ethereum with scalable tech, founder support, and true interoperability.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.