Lisk vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 39.24 tx/s

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
39.24 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 141K txns

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
141K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.84B total transactions

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
1.84B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Lisk vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Lisk and Arbitrum have no data

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Lisk vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,375 developers

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
2,375

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum has 190,016 commits

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
190,016

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,601 stars

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
10,601

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,618 watchers

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
1,618

Data from Chainspect

Lisk vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $13.87K

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
$13.87K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.005516

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.005516

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.218B

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
$1.218B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.129B

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
$2.129B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 57.19%

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
57.19%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Lisk has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2129

Lisk logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.2129

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Lisk

Lisk is a Layer 2 blockchain boosting Web3 adoption in emerging markets on Ethereum with scalable tech, founder support, and true interoperability.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Lisk Socials

Arbitrum Socials