Algorand 
Aptos 
Avalanche 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Polygon 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Waterfall 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Boba Network 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Noble 
Particle 
Plume 
Quai Network 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Sophon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare Keeta Testnet vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTKeeta Testnet vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Keeta Testnet TPS is 6.87X higher than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Keeta Testnet max TPS is 5,463X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Keeta Testnet max theoretical TPS is 1,641X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Keeta Testnet transaction volume is 6.39X higher than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Keeta Testnet block time is 400X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Keeta Testnet finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Keeta Testnet is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Keeta Testnet has 13X more total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Keeta Testnet was launched 4 years after Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Keeta Testnet vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Keeta Testnet has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Keeta Testnet has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Keeta Testnet and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Keeta Testnet is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Keeta Testnet and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Keeta Testnet vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Keeta Testnet has 99.38% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Keeta Testnet has 98.29% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Keeta Testnet has 86.04% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Keeta Testnet has 99.13% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Keeta Testnet has 96.37% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Keeta Testnet vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Keeta Testnet has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $16.06K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Keeta Testnet has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.007819
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Keeta Testnet has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $510.7M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Keeta Testnet has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $802.6M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Keeta Testnet has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 63.63%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Keeta Testnet has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.08026
Data from Chainspect
Keeta Testnet vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Keeta Testnet Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Keeta Testnet
Keeta Testnet is a high-performance blockchain network that bridges traditional finance and digital assets. Built for scalability, security, and compliance, Keeta enables financial institutions and enterprises to integrate blockchain technology while meeting regulatory requirements.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.