Hyperliquid vs Arbitrum
Hyperliquid vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 25.07 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 90,237 txns
Block Time
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Hyperliquid vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Hyperliquid and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Hyperliquid vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New
Developers
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,298 developers
Repos
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos
Commits
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum has 184,536 commits
Stars
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,276 stars
Watchers
Hyperliquid has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers
Other Comparisons
Hyperliquid Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Hyperliquid
Hyperliquid is a Layer 1 blockchain that aims to enhance the efficiency and performance of DeFi applications, especially perpetual futures trading. It offers zero gas fees, instant finality, and a fully on-chain order book for its users.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.