- Compare
- Etherlink vs Polkadex
Etherlink vs Polkadex Scalability
Real-time TPS
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex TPS is 0 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex max TPS is 0.79 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex transaction volume is 0 txns
Block Time
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex block time is 12s
Finality
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex finality is 30s
Type
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex was launched on Sep 26, 2021
Etherlink vs Polkadex Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Etherlink and Polkadex have no data
Validators/Miners
Etherlink and Polkadex have no data
Stake/Hashrate
Etherlink and Polkadex have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex is PoS
Governance
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadex governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Etherlink Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Etherlink
Etherlink is an EVM-compatible, non-custodial Layer 2 blockchain powered by Tezos Smart Rollup technology. It enables seamless integration with existing Ethereum tools, including wallets and indexers, and facilitates asset transfers to and from other EVM-compatible chains. Built upon the secure foundation of Tezos layer 1, Etherlink delivers a fast, fair, and (nearly) free experience. This permissionless and censorship-resistant environment empowers developers to actively create and participate in the next generation of decentralized applications.
About Polkadex
Polkadex is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Polkadot network. It offers high-performance, low-latency trading with a fully decentralized order book. Users can trade assets across different parachains within the Polkadot ecosystem and external blockchains connected via bridges. Polkadex uses L2 scaling solutions for fast, efficient trading and operates on a non-custodial model, allowing users to retain control of their funds at all times.