Compare Etherlink vs Polkadot Ecosystem
Open in ChatGPTEtherlink vs Polkadot Ecosystem Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Etherlink TPS is 13.37% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Etherlink max TPS is 93.98% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Etherlink max theoretical TPS is 99.61% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Etherlink transaction volume is 13.37% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Etherlink block time is 86.74% shorter than Polkadot Ecosystem block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Etherlink finality is 16.66% shorter than Polkadot Ecosystem finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Etherlink is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polkadot Ecosystem is a blockchain ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Etherlink has 93.09% fewer total transactions than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Etherlink was launched 5 years after Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Polkadot Ecosystem Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.43% lower than Polkadot Ecosystem Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Etherlink has 99.83% fewer validators than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadot Ecosystem stake is $1.938B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Etherlink is Rollup (Optimistic), while Polkadot Ecosystem is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Etherlink and Polkadot Ecosystem governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Polkadot Ecosystem Developer Activity
Developers
Etherlink has 98.04% fewer developers than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Etherlink has 96.12% fewer repos than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Etherlink has 99.35% fewer commits than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Etherlink has 99.92% fewer stars than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Etherlink has 99.82% fewer watchers than Polkadot Ecosystem
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Polkadot Ecosystem Financials New
Chain Revenue
Etherlink chain revenue is $232.3, while Polkadot Ecosystem has no data
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Etherlink average transaction fee is $0.001211, while Polkadot Ecosystem has no data
Data from Chainspect
Price
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadot Ecosystem price is $2.307
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Etherlink has no data, while Polkadot Ecosystem market cap is $3.783B
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Polkadot Ecosystem Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Etherlink Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Etherlink
Etherlink is an EVM-compatible, non-custodial Layer 2 blockchain powered by Tezos Smart Rollup technology. It enables seamless integration with existing Ethereum tools, including wallets and indexers, and facilitates asset transfers to and from other EVM-compatible chains. Built upon the secure foundation of Tezos layer 1, Etherlink delivers a fast, fair, and (nearly) free experience. This permissionless and censorship-resistant environment empowers developers to actively create and participate in the next generation of decentralized applications.
Explore the full ecosystem here: Tezos Ecosystem
About Polkadot Ecosystem
Polkadot stands out among other blockchain projects for its focus on enhancing the foundational infrastructure of dApps. It aims to enable interoperability between blockchain ecosystems, facilitating seamless communication without intermediaries. Functioning as a "network of networks," Polkadot utilizes parachains — specialized blockchains with unique functionalities and tokens — to enable interaction between diverse blockchain architectures. Powered by the nominated proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and drawing inspiration from the Ouroboros protocol, Polkadot offers a robust framework for building interconnected and scalable decentralized systems.