Compare Etherlink vs Arbitrum

Etherlink TPS is 86.23% lower than Arbitrum TPS

3.28 tx/s

23.79 tx/s

Etherlink max TPS is 98.39% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

32.76 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

Etherlink max theoretical TPS is 78.9% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

1,286 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

Etherlink transaction volume is 86.23% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

11.8K txns

85.6K txns

Etherlink block time is 3.13X longer than Arbitrum block time

815ms

261ms

Etherlink finality is 97.82% shorter than Arbitrum finality

18s

13m 48s

Etherlink has 95.82% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

98.7M txns

2.37B txns

Etherlink was launched 3 years after Arbitrum

Feb 25, 2025

Aug 31, 2021

Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Etherlink and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators

1

1

Etherlink and Arbitrum have no data

—

—

Etherlink and Arbitrum are both Rollup (Optimistic)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Etherlink and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

On-chain

On-chain

Etherlink has 92.7% fewer developers than Arbitrum

180

2,469

Etherlink has 97.75% fewer commits than Arbitrum

4,816

214,717

Etherlink has 86.46% fewer repos than Arbitrum

18

133

Etherlink has 99.78% fewer stars than Arbitrum

23

10,839

Etherlink has 99.58% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

6

1,463

Etherlink on-chain revenue is 99.77% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

$60.38

$26.33K

Etherlink average transaction fee is 97.12% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

$0.0004222

$0.01468

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.476B

—

$1.476B

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.176B

—

$2.176B

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 67.86%

—

67.86%

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2176

—

$0.2176