Compare Etherlink vs Arbitrum

Etherlink TPS is 75.97% lower than Arbitrum TPS

2.56 tx/s

10.64 tx/s

Etherlink max TPS is 97.87% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

43.35 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

Etherlink max theoretical TPS is 78.91% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

1,286 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

Etherlink transaction volume is 75.97% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

9.2K txns

38.3K txns

Etherlink block time is 6.16X longer than Arbitrum block time

1.77s

288ms

Etherlink finality is 97.83% shorter than Arbitrum finality

18s

13m 48s

Etherlink has 95.63% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

106M txns

2.42B txns

Etherlink was launched 3 years after Arbitrum

Feb 25, 2025

Aug 31, 2021

Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Etherlink and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators

1

1

Etherlink and Arbitrum have no data

—

—

Etherlink and Arbitrum are both Rollup (Optimistic)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Etherlink and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain

On-chain

On-chain

Etherlink has 92.64% fewer developers than Arbitrum

183

2,487

Etherlink has 97.8% fewer commits than Arbitrum

4,847

219,911

Etherlink has 86.76% fewer repos than Arbitrum

18

136

Etherlink has 99.79% fewer stars than Arbitrum

23

10,867

Etherlink has 99.59% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

6

1,457

Etherlink on-chain revenue is 99.74% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

$38.8

$15K

Etherlink average transaction fee is 97.67% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

$0.000331

$0.0142

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.05B

—

$1.05B

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $1.53B

—

$1.53B

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 68.92%

—

68.92%

Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.1527

—

$0.1527