Compare Etherlink vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTEtherlink vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Etherlink TPS is 96.69% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Etherlink max TPS is 98.63% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Etherlink max theoretical TPS is 78.9% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Etherlink transaction volume is 96.69% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Etherlink block time is 4.74X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Etherlink finality is 97.82% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Etherlink and Arbitrum are both layer 2 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Etherlink has 96.84% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Etherlink was launched 3 years after Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Etherlink and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Etherlink and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Etherlink and Arbitrum are both Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Etherlink and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Etherlink has 92.61% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Etherlink has 97.58% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Etherlink has 86.15% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Etherlink has 99.75% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Etherlink has 99.44% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Etherlink chain revenue is 99.29% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Etherlink average transaction fee is 86.22% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $577.5M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $991M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Etherlink has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.0991
Data from Chainspect
Etherlink vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Etherlink Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Etherlink
Etherlink is an EVM-compatible, non-custodial Layer 2 blockchain powered by Tezos Smart Rollup technology. It enables seamless integration with existing Ethereum tools, including wallets and indexers, and facilitates asset transfers to and from other EVM-compatible chains. Built upon the secure foundation of Tezos layer 1, Etherlink delivers a fast, fair, and (nearly) free experience. This permissionless and censorship-resistant environment empowers developers to actively create and participate in the next generation of decentralized applications.
Explore the full ecosystem here: Tezos Ecosystem
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.