Polkadex vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Polkadex TPS is 99.99% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polkadex max TPS is 99.81% lower than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Polkadex max theoretical TPS is 2.1X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Polkadex transaction volume is 99.99% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Polkadex block time is 5.65X longer than Polygon block time
Finality
Polkadex finality is 6X longer than Polygon finality
Type
Polkadex is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Polkadex was launched 1 year after Polygon
Polkadex vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polkadex has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators
Polkadex has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake
Polkadex has no data, while Polygon stake is $825.2M
Consensus Mechanism
Polkadex and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
Polkadex on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Polkadex vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Polkadex Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polkadex
Polkadex is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Polkadot network. It offers high-performance, low-latency trading with a fully decentralized order book. Users can trade assets across different parachains within the Polkadot ecosystem and external blockchains connected via bridges. Polkadex uses L2 scaling solutions for fast, efficient trading and operates on a non-custodial model, allowing users to retain control of their funds at all times.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.