- Compare
- Dymension vs Arbitrum
Dymension vs Arbitrum
Dymension vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 16.62 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume (1H)
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 59.8K txns
Block Time (1H)
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Total Transactions
Neither Dymension nor Arbitrum have data for total transactions
Launch Date
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Dymension vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Dymension and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Dymension vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New
Developers
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,303 developers
Repos
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos
Commits
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum has 184,679 commits
Stars
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,300 stars
Watchers
Dymension has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers
Other Comparisons
Dymension Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Dymension
Dymension is a Layer 1 blockchain connecting users and liquidity with lightning-fast blockchains called RollApps.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.