Dymension vs Polygon
Dymension vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Dymension has no data, while Polygon TPS is 34.35 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Dymension has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Dymension has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume (1H)
Dymension has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 124K txns
Block Time (1H)
Dymension has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Dymension has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Dymension has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Total Transactions
Dymension has no data, while Polygon has 5.64B total transactions
Launch Date
Dymension has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Dymension vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Dymension has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Dymension has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Dymension has no data, while Polygon stake is $869.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Dymension has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Dymension has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Dymension vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Dymension has no data, while Polygon has 1,654 developers
Repos
Dymension has no data, while Polygon has 148 repos
Commits
Dymension has no data, while Polygon has 61,429 commits
Stars
Dymension has no data, while Polygon has 9,116 stars
Watchers
Dymension has no data, while Polygon has 1,808 watchers
Other Comparisons
Dymension Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Dymension
Dymension is a Layer 1 blockchain connecting users and liquidity with lightning-fast blockchains called RollApps.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.