Darwinia vs Polygon
Darwinia vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon TPS is 54.11 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 194,787 txns
Block Time
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.12s
Finality
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Darwinia vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon has 105 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon stake is $809.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Darwinia has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
Darwinia Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Darwinia
Darwinia is pioneering the development of cutting-edge cross-chain service solutions, with a strategic emphasis on boosting the cross-chain functionalities of decentralized applications. At its core, the Darwinia Chains represents an EVM-compliant network built upon the Polkadot framework. It has been designed to integrate seamlessly with various bridge tools, such as the Helix Bridge and the Msgport protocol. This integration facilitates the connection between assets within the Polkadot ecosystem and the wider array of EVM chains present in the Ethereum ecosystem.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.