Bitgreen vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon TPS is 50.01 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 180,042 txns
Block Time
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Bitgreen vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon has 105 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon stake is $809.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Bitgreen has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
Bitgreen Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Bitgreen
Bitgreen is built on the Base network, a secure, low-cost, and developer-friendly Layer 2 blockchain (a scaling solution built on top of Ethereum) created by Coinbase. This integration provides Bitgreen with enhanced scalability, faster transaction speeds, and seamless accessibility for users.
Base's robust infrastructure ensures a reliable and efficient environment for the Bitgreen ecosystem, allowing us to focus on developing innovative applications and delivering real-world value.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.