Arbitrum vs Frequency Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 28.46 tx/s, while Frequency has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s, while Frequency has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while Frequency has no data
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 102,472 txns, while Frequency has no data
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Frequency has no data
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Frequency has no data
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Frequency has no data
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Frequency has no data
Arbitrum vs Frequency Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Frequency has no data
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Frequency has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum and Frequency have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Frequency has no data
Governance
Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Frequency has no data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Frequency
Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.