Arbitrum vs Frequency Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 34.14 tx/s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
34.14 tx/s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 123K txns, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
123K txns
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Arbitrum has 1.79B total transactions, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
1.79B txns
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Frequency Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Arbitrum and Frequency have no data

Arbitrum logo
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Frequency Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 2,373 developers, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
2,373
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 189,773 commits, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
189,773
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 129 repos, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
129
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 10,549 stars, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
10,549
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 1,615 watchers, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,615
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Frequency Financials New

Chain Revenue

Arbitrum chain revenue is $35.23K, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$35.23K
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.01072, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.01072
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is $1.087B, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$1.087B
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is $1.935B, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$1.935B
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
56.18%
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is $0.1935, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.1935
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Frequency

Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Frequency Socials