Arbitrum vs Frequency Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 40.56 tx/s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
40.56 tx/s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 146K txns, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
146K txns
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 2.03B total transactions, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
2.03B txns
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Frequency Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Arbitrum and Frequency have no data

Arbitrum logo
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Frequency Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 2,385 developers, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
2,385
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 191,833 commits, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
191,833
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 132 repos, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
132
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 10,712 stars, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
10,712
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 1,612 watchers, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,612
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Frequency Financials New

Chain Revenue

Arbitrum chain revenue is $19.1K, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$19.1K
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.005037, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.005037
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is $604.8M, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$604.8M
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is $1.018B, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$1.018B
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 59.39%, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
59.39%
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is $0.1018, while Frequency has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.1018
Frequency logo

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Frequency

Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Frequency Socials