- Compare
- Frequency vs Optimism
Frequency vs Optimism Scalability
Real-time TPS
Frequency has no data, while Optimism TPS is 34.71 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Frequency has no data, while Optimism max TPS is 200.2 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Frequency has no data, while Optimism max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Frequency has no data, while Optimism transaction volume is 124,962 txns
Block Time
Frequency has no data, while Optimism block time is 2s
Finality
Frequency has no data, while Optimism finality is 16m 48s
Type
Frequency has no data, while Optimism is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Frequency has no data, while Optimism was launched on Dec 16, 2021
Frequency vs Optimism Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Frequency has no data, while Optimism Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Frequency has no data, while Optimism has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Frequency and Optimism have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Frequency has no data, while Optimism is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Frequency has no data, while Optimism governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Frequency Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Frequency
Frequency enables Web3 social at scale and is the first production implementation of the Decentralized Social Networking Protocol (DSNP.org). Frequency is designed so that applications collaborate instead of competing when submitting transactions.
About Optimism
Optimism provides a Layer 2 scaling fix for Ethereum, greatly boosting its scalability and cutting down on gas fees. It maintains robust security measures and guarantees a smooth development experience. Through Optimistic Rollups, it enables swift transaction processing, positioning Ethereum as a viable option for deploying intricate and interactive applications.