Compare Abstract vs Ethereum
Open in ChatGPTAbstract vs Ethereum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum TPS is 23.2 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum max TPS is 62.87 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum max theoretical TPS is 238.1 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum transaction volume is 83.5K txns
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum block time is 12.04s
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum finality is 12m 48s
Data from Chainspect
Type
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum has 3.22B total transactions
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum was launched on Jul 30, 2015
Data from Chainspect
Abstract vs Ethereum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum Nakamoto Coefficient is 2
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum has 975,600 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum stake is $98.75B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum governance is off-chain
Data from Chainspect
Abstract vs Ethereum Developer Activity
Developers
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum has 8,436 developers
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum has 491,979 commits
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum has 408 repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum has 189,376 stars
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum has 11,787 watchers
Data from Chainspect
Abstract vs Ethereum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum chain revenue is $811.6K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum average transaction fee is $0.3611
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum market cap is $325.4B
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum FDV is $325.4B
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 100.00%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Abstract has no data, while Ethereum price is $2,696
Data from Chainspect
Other Comparisons
Abstract Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.
About Ethereum
Ethereum emerges as a decentralized, open-source blockchain platform empowering developers to craft and deploy smart contracts alongside dApps. Pioneering the smart contract concept, Ethereum enables self-executing agreements with terms directly encoded into its blockchain, eliminating the need for intermediaries. Additionally, Ethereum serves as a hub for the creation and exchange of NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) and various digital assets. Its intrinsic cryptocurrency, Ether (ETH), facilitates network transactions and incentivizes miners to uphold network security. Ethereum's evolution to Ethereum 2.0 introduces a proof-of-stake (PoS) mechanism, aiming to enhance scalability and energy efficiency.