Compare Abstract vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTAbstract vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 53.16 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 191K txns
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Data from Chainspect
Type
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.99B total transactions
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Data from Chainspect
Abstract vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
Abstract and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Abstract vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,382 developers
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 191,479 commits
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 130 repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,691 stars
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,611 watchers
Data from Chainspect
Abstract vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $13.48K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.00332
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $565.8M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $971M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.0971
Data from Chainspect
Other Comparisons
Abstract Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.