Compare Abstract vs Arbitrum

Abstract vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 42.16 tx/s

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
42.16 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 152K txns

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
152K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.6B total transactions

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
1.6B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Abstract vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Abstract and Arbitrum have no data

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Abstract vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New

Developers

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,318 developers

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
2,318

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 127 repos

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
127

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 185,412 commits

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
185,412

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,361 stars

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
10,361

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,623 watchers

Abstract logo
Arbitrum logo
1,623

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Abstract

Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.

Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.

Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Abstract Socials

Arbitrum Socials