Abstract vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 28.18 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 101,444 txns
Block Time
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Abstract vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Abstract and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Abstract has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Abstract Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.