XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 31.93 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
31.93 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,720 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
1,720 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 115K txns

X
Arbitrum logo
115K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

X
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

X
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

X
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.89B total transactions

X
Arbitrum logo
1.89B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

X
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

X
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

X
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

XYO Layer One and Arbitrum have no data

X
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

X
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

X
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,380 developers

X
Arbitrum logo
2,380

Data from Chainspect

Commits

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 190,634 commits

X
Arbitrum logo
190,634

Data from Chainspect

Repos

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

X
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Stars

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,653 stars

X
Arbitrum logo
10,653

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,616 watchers

X
Arbitrum logo
1,616

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $36.65K

X
Arbitrum logo
$36.65K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.008528

X
Arbitrum logo
$0.008528

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $900.4M

X
Arbitrum logo
$900.4M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $1.545B

X
Arbitrum logo
$1.545B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%

X
Arbitrum logo
58.27%

Data from Chainspect

Price

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.1545

X
Arbitrum logo
$0.1545

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About XYO Layer One

XYO Layer One: The first scalable blockchain built for data.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

XYO Layer One Socials

Arbitrum Socials