XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 31.41 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
31.41 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 113K txns

X
Arbitrum logo
113K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

X
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

X
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

X
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.75B total transactions

X
Arbitrum logo
1.75B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

X
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

X
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

X
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

XYO Layer One and Arbitrum have no data

X
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

X
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

X
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,364 developers

X
Arbitrum logo
2,364

Data from Chainspect

Repos

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

X
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Commits

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,441 commits

X
Arbitrum logo
189,441

Data from Chainspect

Stars

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,514 stars

X
Arbitrum logo
10,514

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,617 watchers

X
Arbitrum logo
1,617

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $62.07K

X
Arbitrum logo
$62.07K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.01376

X
Arbitrum logo
$0.01376

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.215B

X
Arbitrum logo
$1.215B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.163B

X
Arbitrum logo
$2.163B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%

X
Arbitrum logo
56.18%

Data from Chainspect

Price

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2163

X
Arbitrum logo
$0.2163

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About XYO Layer One

XYO Layer One: The first scalable blockchain built for data.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

XYO Layer One Socials

Arbitrum Socials