XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 55 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
55 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

X
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 198K txns

X
Arbitrum logo
198K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

X
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

X
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

X
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.99B total transactions

X
Arbitrum logo
1.99B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

X
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

X
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

X
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

XYO Layer One and Arbitrum have no data

X
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

X
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

X
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,382 developers

X
Arbitrum logo
2,382

Data from Chainspect

Commits

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 191,460 commits

X
Arbitrum logo
191,460

Data from Chainspect

Repos

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 130 repos

X
Arbitrum logo
130

Data from Chainspect

Stars

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,687 stars

X
Arbitrum logo
10,687

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,614 watchers

X
Arbitrum logo
1,614

Data from Chainspect

XYO Layer One vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $16.01K

X
Arbitrum logo
$16.01K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.003945

X
Arbitrum logo
$0.003945

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $566M

X
Arbitrum logo
$566M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $971.4M

X
Arbitrum logo
$971.4M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%

X
Arbitrum logo
58.27%

Data from Chainspect

Price

XYO Layer One has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.09714

X
Arbitrum logo
$0.09714

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About XYO Layer One

XYO Layer One: The first scalable blockchain built for data.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

XYO Layer One Socials

Arbitrum Socials