Algorand 
Aptos 
Arbitrum 
Avalanche 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Starknet 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Waterfall 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Boba Network 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Noble 
Particle 
Plume 
Quai Network 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Sophon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare XION vs Polygon
Open in ChatGPTXION vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
XION has no data, while Polygon TPS is 81.32 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
XION has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 537.5 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
XION has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 3,810 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
XION has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 293K txns
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
XION has no data, while Polygon block time is 1.5s
Data from Chainspect
Finality
XION has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Data from Chainspect
Type
XION has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
XION has no data, while Polygon has 7.56B total transactions
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
XION has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Data from Chainspect
XION vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
XION has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
XION has no data, while Polygon has 102 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
XION has no data, while Polygon stake is $282.4M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
XION has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
XION has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Data from Chainspect
XION vs Polygon Developer Activity
Developers
XION has no data, while Polygon has 1,811 developers
Data from Chainspect
Commits
XION has no data, while Polygon has 65,994 commits
Data from Chainspect
Repos
XION has no data, while Polygon has 168 repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
XION has no data, while Polygon has 9,503 stars
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
XION has no data, while Polygon has 1,241 watchers
Data from Chainspect
XION vs Polygon Financials New
Chain Revenue
XION has no data, while Polygon chain revenue is $92.54K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
XION has no data, while Polygon average transaction fee is $0.0136
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
XION has no data, while Polygon market cap is $847.7M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
XION has no data, while Polygon FDV is $847.7M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
XION has no data, while Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 100.00%
Data from Chainspect
Price
XION has no data, while Polygon price is $0.07948
Data from Chainspect
Other Comparisons
XION Comparisons
About Blockchains
About XION
XION is a blockchain infrastructure built with user experience at the core. The chain integrates complex functionalities such as account management, signature handling, fee abstraction, and interoperability directly at the protocol level. The aim is to simplify blockchain interactions for mainstream users by addressing the technical complexities that currently hinder widespread adoption.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.