Waterfall vs Polygon
Waterfall vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Waterfall TPS is 97.98% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 30X higher than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 19X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Waterfall transaction volume is 97.98% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Waterfall block time is 1.33X longer than Polygon block time
Finality
Waterfall finality is 4.8X longer than Polygon finality
Type
Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 4 years after Polygon
Waterfall vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators
Waterfall has 605X more validators than Polygon
Stake
Waterfall stake is 99.96% lower than Polygon stake
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Polygon off-chain governance
Waterfall vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Waterfall has 99.21% fewer developers than Polygon
Repos
Waterfall has 94.59% fewer repos than Polygon
Commits
Waterfall has 99.6% fewer commits than Polygon
Stars
Waterfall has 99.96% fewer stars than Polygon
Watchers
Waterfall has 99.88% fewer watchers than Polygon
Waterfall vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.