Compare Waterfall vs Polygon
Open in ChatGPTWaterfall vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Waterfall TPS is 99.87% lower than Polygon TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 60X higher than Polygon max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 18X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Waterfall transaction volume is 99.87% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Waterfall block time is 3.35X longer than Polygon block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Waterfall finality is 4.8X longer than Polygon finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Waterfall has 99.61% fewer total transactions than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 4 years after Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Waterfall has 96.11% fewer validators than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Waterfall has no data, while Polygon stake is $359M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall and Polygon are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Polygon off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Polygon Developer Activity
Developers
Waterfall has 62.71% fewer developers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Waterfall has 76.16% fewer commits than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Waterfall has 93.37% fewer repos than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Waterfall has 99.96% fewer stars than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Waterfall has 99.83% fewer watchers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Polygon Financials New
Chain Revenue
Waterfall has no data, while Polygon chain revenue is $96.72K
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Waterfall has no data, while Polygon average transaction fee is $0.01232
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Waterfall has no data, while Polygon market cap is $1.06B
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Waterfall FDV is 100% lower than Polygon FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Waterfall has no data, while Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 100.00%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Waterfall has no data, while Polygon price is $0.09961
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Polygon Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.