Compare Waterfall vs Polygon

Waterfall TPS is 99.37% lower than Polygon TPS

0.37 tx/s

59.8 tx/s

Waterfall max TPS is 60X higher than Polygon max TPS

32,434 tx/s

537.5 tx/s

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 11X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS

41,666 tx/s

3,810 tx/s

Waterfall transaction volume is 99.37% lower than Polygon transaction volume

1.34K txns

215K txns

Waterfall block time is 2.05X longer than Polygon block time

3.08s

1.5s

Waterfall finality is 4.8X longer than Polygon finality

24s

5s

Waterfall has 99.6% fewer total transactions than Polygon

31.7M txns

8.1B txns

Waterfall was launched 4 years after Polygon

Jul 17, 2024

May 30, 2020

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient

1

4

Waterfall has 96.19% fewer validators than Polygon

4

105

Waterfall has no data, while Polygon stake is $340M

—

$340M

Waterfall and Polygon are both PoS

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Waterfall council governance is worse than Polygon off-chain governance

Council

Off-chain

Waterfall has 56.63% fewer developers than Polygon

791

1,824

Waterfall has 65.13% fewer commits than Polygon

23,540

67,510

Waterfall has 92.04% fewer repos than Polygon

14

176

Waterfall has 99.96% fewer stars than Polygon

3

9,550

Waterfall has 99.83% fewer watchers than Polygon

2

1,247

Waterfall has no data, while Polygon on-chain revenue is $82.26K

—

$82.26K

Waterfall has no data, while Polygon average transaction fee is $0.01412

—

$0.01412

Waterfall has no data, while Polygon market cap is $1.048B

—

$1.048B

Waterfall has no data, while Polygon FDV is $1.048B

—

$1.048B

Waterfall has no data, while Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio is 100.00%

—

100.00%

Waterfall has no data, while Polygon price is $0.09784

—

$0.09784