- Compare
- Waterfall vs Solana
Waterfall vs Solana Scalability
Real-time TPS
Waterfall TPS is 99.98% lower than Solana TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 4.36X higher than Solana max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 79.48% lower than Solana max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Waterfall transaction volume is 99.98% lower than Solana transaction volume
Block Time
Waterfall block time is 14X longer than Solana block time
Finality
Waterfall finality is 1.88X longer than Solana finality
Type
Waterfall and Solana are both layer 1 blockchains
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 4 years after Solana
Waterfall vs Solana Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall has no data, while Solana Nakamoto Coefficient is 21
Validators
Waterfall has 53X more validators than Solana
Stake
Waterfall stake is 1.793B WATER, while Solana stake is 404.7M SOL
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall and Solana are both PoS
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Solana off-chain governance
Waterfall vs Solana Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Solana
Solana stands out as a high-performance blockchain, celebrated for its scalability, speed, and minimal transaction expenses. Featuring a distinctive consensus mechanism dubbed Proof of History (PoH), Solana achieves remarkable scalability and efficiency. Tailored to accommodate dApps, it excels in processing a vast number of transactions swiftly, thereby slashing processing durations and fees. These attributes make it a compelling platform for developers within the cryptocurrency realm.