Real-time TPS
Chainspect
Waterfall TPS is 97.88% less than Arbitrum TPS
0.61 tx/s
29.04 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Chainspect
Waterfall max TPS is 11X more than Arbitrum max TPS
12,693 tx/s
1,105 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Chainspect
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 66.66% less than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
13,333 tx/s
40,000 tx/s
New
Transaction Volume
Chainspect
Waterfall transaction volume is 97.88% less than Arbitrum transaction volume
2,208 txns
104,533 txns
Block Time
Chainspect
Waterfall block time is 24X more than Arbitrum block time
5.96s
0.25s
Finality
Chainspect
Waterfall finality is 97.5% less than Arbitrum finality
24s
16m
Nakamoto Coefficient
Chainspect
Waterfall and Arbitrum nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Soon
Soon
Active Addresses
Chainspect
Waterfall and Arbitrum active addresses are both coming soon
Soon
Soon
Governance
Chainspect
Waterfall council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Council
On-chain
Type
Chainspect
Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Layer 1 blockchain
Layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Chainspect
Waterfall was launched 3 years after Arbitrum
Jul 17, 2024
Aug 31, 2021
Waterfall vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.