Compare Waterfall vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTWaterfall vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Waterfall TPS is 99.76% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 23X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 6.84X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Waterfall transaction volume is 99.76% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Waterfall block time is 94X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Waterfall finality is 97.1% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Waterfall has 98.64% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 3 years after Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Waterfall has 116,950X more validators than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Waterfall stake is $639.8K, while Arbitrum has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Waterfall has 99.44% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Waterfall has 93.75% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Waterfall has 99.87% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Waterfall has 99.97% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Waterfall has 99.87% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Waterfall chain revenue is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Waterfall average transaction fee is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Price
Waterfall price is 99.91% lower than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.087B
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.