Compare Waterfall vs Arbitrum

Waterfall TPS is 100% lower than Arbitrum TPS

0 tx/s

10.92 tx/s

Waterfall max TPS is 41X higher than Arbitrum max TPS

83,333 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 6.84X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

41,666 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

Waterfall transaction volume is 100% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

0 txns

39.3K txns

Waterfall block time is 100% shorter than Arbitrum block time

0s

290ms

Waterfall finality is 97.1% shorter than Arbitrum finality

24s

13m 48s

Waterfall has 98.57% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

34.1M txns

2.4B txns

Waterfall was launched 3 years after Arbitrum

Jul 17, 2024

Aug 31, 2021

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Waterfall has 4X more validators than Arbitrum

4

1

Waterfall and Arbitrum have no data

—

—

Waterfall is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Waterfall council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

Waterfall has 68.14% fewer developers than Arbitrum

791

2,483

Waterfall has 89.25% fewer commits than Arbitrum

23,574

219,380

Waterfall has 89.47% fewer repos than Arbitrum

14

133

Waterfall has 99.97% fewer stars than Arbitrum

3

10,856

Waterfall has 99.86% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

2

1,463

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum on-chain revenue is $12.74K

—

$12.74K

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.01408

—

$0.01408

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.257B

—

$1.257B

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $1.823B

—

$1.823B

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 68.92%

—

68.92%

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.1823

—

$0.1823