Compare Waterfall vs Arbitrum

Waterfall TPS is 97.62% lower than Arbitrum TPS

0.37 tx/s

15.65 tx/s

Waterfall max TPS is 16X higher than Arbitrum max TPS

32,434 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 6.84X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

41,666 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

Waterfall transaction volume is 97.62% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

1.34K txns

56.3K txns

Waterfall block time is 12X longer than Arbitrum block time

3.08s

258ms

Waterfall finality is 97.1% shorter than Arbitrum finality

24s

13m 48s

Waterfall has 98.65% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

31.7M txns

2.36B txns

Waterfall was launched 3 years after Arbitrum

Jul 17, 2024

Aug 31, 2021

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Waterfall has 4X more validators than Arbitrum

4

1

Waterfall and Arbitrum have no data

—

—

Waterfall is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Waterfall council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

Waterfall has 67.94% fewer developers than Arbitrum

791

2,468

Waterfall has 89.03% fewer commits than Arbitrum

23,540

214,626

Waterfall has 89.47% fewer repos than Arbitrum

14

133

Waterfall has 99.97% fewer stars than Arbitrum

3

10,833

Waterfall has 99.86% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

2

1,465

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum on-chain revenue is $17.99K

—

$17.99K

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.009041

—

$0.009041

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.304B

—

$1.304B

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $1.921B

—

$1.921B

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 67.86%

—

67.86%

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.1921

—

$0.1921