Compare Waterfall vs Arbitrum

Waterfall TPS is 97.43% lower than Arbitrum TPS

0.37 tx/s

14.49 tx/s

Waterfall max TPS is 16X higher than Arbitrum max TPS

32,434 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 6.84X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

41,666 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

Waterfall transaction volume is 97.43% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

1.34K txns

52.1K txns

Waterfall block time is 12X longer than Arbitrum block time

3.04s

250ms

Waterfall finality is 97.1% shorter than Arbitrum finality

24s

13m 48s

Waterfall has 98.66% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

30.8M txns

2.31B txns

Waterfall was launched 3 years after Arbitrum

Jul 17, 2024

Aug 31, 2021

Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Waterfall has 4X more validators than Arbitrum

4

1

Waterfall and Arbitrum have no data

—

—

Waterfall is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Rollup (Optimistic)

Waterfall council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

Waterfall has 67.85% fewer developers than Arbitrum

791

2,461

Waterfall has 88.27% fewer commits than Arbitrum

23,540

200,701

Waterfall has 89.39% fewer repos than Arbitrum

14

132

Waterfall has 99.97% fewer stars than Arbitrum

3

10,815

Waterfall has 99.86% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

2

1,482

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum on-chain revenue is $22.65K

—

$22.65K

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.01237

—

$0.01237

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $582.9M

—

$582.9M

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $872.9M

—

$872.9M

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 66.78%

—

66.78%

Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.08729

—

$0.08729