Waterfall vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Waterfall TPS is 99.44% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 9.34X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 66.66% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Waterfall transaction volume is 99.44% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Waterfall block time is 25X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Waterfall finality is 97.1% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 3 years after Arbitrum
Waterfall vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators
Waterfall has 63,253X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Waterfall stake is $297.2K, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Waterfall vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.