Compare Saga vs Arbitrum

Saga vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 37.68 tx/s

S
Arbitrum logo
37.68 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s

S
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s

S
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 136K txns

S
Arbitrum logo
136K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

S
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

S
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

S
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.67B total transactions

S
Arbitrum logo
1.67B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

S
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Saga vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

S
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

S
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Saga and Arbitrum have no data

S
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

S
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

S
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Saga vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,330 developers

S
Arbitrum logo
2,330

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum has 128 repos

S
Arbitrum logo
128

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum has 188,530 commits

S
Arbitrum logo
188,530

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,438 stars

S
Arbitrum logo
10,438

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,619 watchers

S
Arbitrum logo
1,619

Data from Chainspect

Saga vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $117.2K

S
Arbitrum logo
$117.2K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.03527

S
Arbitrum logo
$0.03527

Data from Chainspect

Price

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2494

S
Arbitrum logo
$0.2494

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Saga has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.374B

S
Arbitrum logo
$1.374B

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Saga

The L1 to launch L1s. Infinite Horizontal Scalability.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Saga Socials

Arbitrum Socials