- Compare
- NEAR vs Polygon
NEAR vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
NEAR TPS is 1.33X higher than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
NEAR max TPS is 9.64X higher than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
NEAR max theoretical TPS is 22X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
NEAR transaction volume is 1.33X higher than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
NEAR block time is 71.34% shorter than Polygon block time
Finality
NEAR finality is 88% shorter than Polygon finality
Type
NEAR is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
NEAR was launched 1 month before Polygon
NEAR vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
NEAR Nakamoto Coefficient is 25% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
NEAR has 67.96% fewer validators than Polygon
Stake
NEAR stake is 102.5M NEAR, while Polygon stake is 3.507B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
NEAR and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
NEAR council governance is worse than Polygon off-chain governance
NEAR vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
NEAR Comparisons
About Blockchains
About NEAR
NEAR is the chain abstraction stack, empowering builders to create apps that scale to billions of users and across all blockchains.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.