Advertise on Chainspect

Compare NEAR vs Arbitrum

NEAR vs Arbitrum TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

NEAR TPS is 38.87% lower than Arbitrum TPS

NEAR logo
7.56 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
12.37 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

NEAR max TPS is 2.03X higher than Arbitrum max TPS

NEAR logo
4,135 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

NEAR max theoretical TPS is 164X higher than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

NEAR logo
1,000,000 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

NEAR transaction volume is 38.87% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

NEAR logo
27.2K txns
Arbitrum logo
44.5K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

NEAR block time is 2.06X longer than Arbitrum block time

NEAR logo
575ms
Arbitrum logo
280ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

NEAR finality is 99.86% shorter than Arbitrum finality

NEAR logo
1.2s
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

NEAR has 2.27X more total transactions than Arbitrum

NEAR logo
5.46B txns
Arbitrum logo
2.41B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

NEAR was launched 1 year before Arbitrum

NEAR logo
Apr 22, 2020
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

NEAR vs Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

NEAR Nakamoto Coefficient is 10X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

NEAR logo
10
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

NEAR has 387X more validators than Arbitrum

NEAR logo
387
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

NEAR stake is $2.62B, while Arbitrum has no data

NEAR logo
$2.62B
Arbitrum logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

NEAR is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

NEAR logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

NEAR council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

NEAR logo
Council
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

NEAR vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

NEAR has 48.99% fewer developers than Arbitrum

NEAR logo
1,268
Arbitrum logo
2,486

Data from Chainspect

Commits

NEAR has 62.78% fewer commits than Arbitrum

NEAR logo
81,749
Arbitrum logo
219,639

Data from Chainspect

Repos

NEAR has 2.04X more repos than Arbitrum

NEAR logo
276
Arbitrum logo
135

Data from Chainspect

Stars

NEAR has 5.91% fewer stars than Arbitrum

NEAR logo
10,215
Arbitrum logo
10,857

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

NEAR has 13.53% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

NEAR logo
1,259
Arbitrum logo
1,456

Data from Chainspect

NEAR vs Arbitrum Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

NEAR on-chain revenue is 82.62% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

NEAR logo
$3.62K
Arbitrum logo
$20.8K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

NEAR average transaction fee is 62.87% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

NEAR logo
$0.0063
Arbitrum logo
$0.017

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

NEAR market cap is 5.04X higher than Arbitrum market cap

NEAR logo
$5.82B
Arbitrum logo
$1.15B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

NEAR FDV is 3.47X higher than Arbitrum FDV

NEAR logo
$5.82B
Arbitrum logo
$1.67B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

NEAR Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.45X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio

NEAR logo
100.00%
Arbitrum logo
68.92%

Data from Chainspect

Price

NEAR price is 27X higher than Arbitrum price

NEAR logo
$4.44
Arbitrum logo
$0.1675

Data from Chainspect

NEAR vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow