- Compare
- NEAR vs Arbitrum
NEAR vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
NEAR TPS is 20.13% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
NEAR max TPS is 3.74X higher than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
NEAR max theoretical TPS is 60% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
NEAR transaction volume is 20.13% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
NEAR block time is 2.43X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
NEAR finality is 99.92% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
NEAR is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
NEAR was launched 1 year before Arbitrum
NEAR vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
NEAR Nakamoto Coefficient is 11X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
NEAR has 315X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
NEAR stake is 565.2M NEAR, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
NEAR is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
NEAR council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
NEAR vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
NEAR Comparisons
About Blockchains
About NEAR
NEAR is the chain abstraction stack, empowering builders to create apps that scale to billions of users and across all blockchains.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.