- Compare
- Mavryk Network vs Arbitrum
Mavryk Network vs Arbitrum
Mavryk Network vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 22.13 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume (1H)
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 79.7K txns
Block Time (1H)
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Total Transactions
Neither Mavryk Network nor Arbitrum have data for total transactions
Launch Date
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Mavryk Network vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Mavryk Network and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Mavryk Network vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New
Developers
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,303 developers
Repos
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos
Commits
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 184,679 commits
Stars
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,300 stars
Watchers
Mavryk Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers
Other Comparisons
Mavryk Network Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Mavryk Network
Mavryk Network is a Layer-1 blockchain purpose-built to bring trillions in real-world assets on-chain, accelerating the adoption of Web3 worldwide.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.