Lumia vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 64.6 tx/s

L
Arbitrum logo
64.6 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s

L
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

L
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 233K txns

L
Arbitrum logo
233K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

L
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

L
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

L
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum has 2B total transactions

L
Arbitrum logo
2B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

L
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Lumia vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

L
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

L
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Lumia and Arbitrum have no data

L
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

L
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

L
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Lumia vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,382 developers

L
Arbitrum logo
2,382

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum has 191,484 commits

L
Arbitrum logo
191,484

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum has 130 repos

L
Arbitrum logo
130

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,695 stars

L
Arbitrum logo
10,695

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,611 watchers

L
Arbitrum logo
1,611

Data from Chainspect

Lumia vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $17.58K

L
Arbitrum logo
$17.58K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.003734

L
Arbitrum logo
$0.003734

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $542M

L
Arbitrum logo
$542M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $930.1M

L
Arbitrum logo
$930.1M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%

L
Arbitrum logo
58.27%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Lumia has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.09301

L
Arbitrum logo
$0.09301

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Lumia

Lumia is a full-cycle RWA system that connects institutions and supports the full lifecycle of tokenized assets, bringing real-world sectors on-chain.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Lumia Socials

Arbitrum Socials