- Compare
- Katana vs Polygon
Katana vs Polygon
Katana vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Katana has no data, while Polygon TPS is 33.79 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Katana has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Katana has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume (1H)
Katana has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 122K txns
Block Time (1H)
Katana has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Katana has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Katana has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Total Transactions
Katana has no data, while Polygon has 5.64B total transactions
Launch Date
Katana has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Katana vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Katana has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Katana has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Katana has no data, while Polygon stake is $850.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Katana has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Katana has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Katana vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Katana has no data, while Polygon has 1,654 developers
Repos
Katana has no data, while Polygon has 148 repos
Commits
Katana has no data, while Polygon has 61,435 commits
Stars
Katana has no data, while Polygon has 9,187 stars
Watchers
Katana has no data, while Polygon has 1,876 watchers
Other Comparisons
Katana Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Katana
Katana is a defi chain forged to bring dead bags to life via deep liquidity & real yield built by katana foundation
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.