- Compare
- Flare vs Arbitrum
Flare vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 28.36 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 102,097 txns
Block Time
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Flare vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Flare and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Flare has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Flare Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Flare
Flare is a full-stack layer 1 solution designed for data intensive use cases.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.