Energy Web X vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 31.09 tx/s

E
Arbitrum logo
31.09 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,402 tx/s

E
Arbitrum logo
1,402 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

E
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 112K txns

E
Arbitrum logo
112K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

E
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

E
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

E
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum has 1.78B total transactions

E
Arbitrum logo
1.78B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

E
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Energy Web X vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

E
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

E
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Energy Web X and Arbitrum have no data

E
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

E
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

E
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Energy Web X vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,370 developers

E
Arbitrum logo
2,370

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum has 189,674 commits

E
Arbitrum logo
189,674

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum has 129 repos

E
Arbitrum logo
129

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,548 stars

E
Arbitrum logo
10,548

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,615 watchers

E
Arbitrum logo
1,615

Data from Chainspect

Energy Web X vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $19.76K

E
Arbitrum logo
$19.76K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.005517

E
Arbitrum logo
$0.005517

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $1.183B

E
Arbitrum logo
$1.183B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $2.106B

E
Arbitrum logo
$2.106B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 56.18%

E
Arbitrum logo
56.18%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Energy Web X has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.2106

E
Arbitrum logo
$0.2106

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Energy Web X

The Energy Web is unleashing blockchain’s potential in the energy sector. Energy Web Foundation (EWF) has pioneered an enterprise-grade blockchain platform tailored to the sector’s regulatory, operational, and market needs.

EWF is the world's largest energy blockchain ecosystem—a growing community of over 100 energy market participants who we work with to bring energy blockchain solutions to market. The Energy Web has become the industry’s largest energy blockchain ecosystem and leading choice for decentralized technology powering the world’s energy future.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Energy Web X Socials

Arbitrum Socials