Core DAO vs Polygon
Core DAO vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon TPS is 47.92 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 172,498 txns
Block Time
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.12s
Finality
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Core DAO vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon has 105 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon stake is $809.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Core DAO has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
Core DAO Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Core DAO
The Core blockchain is a high-performance, EVM-compatible Layer-1 blockchain, designed to be Bitcoin's complementary and hyper-scalable smart contract platform. By leveraging Bitcoin-native CLTV timelocks, Bitcoin mining hash power, and modern smart contract capabilities, Core unlocks Bitcoin as both the prime protector and central asset of a thriving decentralized application ecosystem. As the only end-to-end platform supporting both Bitcoin Staking and EVM-compatible smart contracts, Core serves as Bitcoin's first Proof of Stake layer.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.