- Compare
- Casper vs Arbitrum
Casper vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 34.85 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,105 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 125,458 txns
Block Time
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Casper vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Casper and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Casper has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Casper Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Casper
Casper is a smart-contracting platform, backed by a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and WebAssembly (Wasm). The network is a permissionless, decentralized, public blockchain.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.