Arbitrum vs Linea Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 57.7 tx/s, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
57.7 tx/s
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 208K txns, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
208K txns
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 1.94B total transactions, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
1.94B txns
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Linea Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Arbitrum and Linea have no data

Arbitrum logo
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Linea Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 2,381 developers, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
2,381
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 190,837 commits, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
190,837
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 130 repos, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
130
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 10,671 stars, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
10,671
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 1,614 watchers, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,614
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Linea Financials New

Chain Revenue

Arbitrum chain revenue is $32.29K, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
$32.29K
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.005886, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.005886
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is $699.2M, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
$699.2M
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is $1.2B, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
$1.2B
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
58.27%
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is $0.12, while Linea has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.12
Linea logo

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Linea

Linea is an innovative Layer 2 (L2) on which new decentralized applications (dapps) will be built by developers and made easily accessible in MetaMask.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Linea Socials