Compare Acala vs Concordium
Open in ChatGPTAcala vs Concordium Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Acala has no data, while Concordium TPS is 0.04 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acala has no data, while Concordium max TPS is 64.62 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Acala has no data, while Concordium max theoretical TPS is 2,000 tx/s
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Acala has no data, while Concordium transaction volume is 143 txns
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Acala has no data, while Concordium block time is 2.01s
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Acala has no data, while Concordium finality is 2s
Data from Chainspect
Type
Acala has no data, while Concordium is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Acala has no data, while Concordium has 174M total transactions
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Acala has no data, while Concordium was launched on Jun 9, 2021
Data from Chainspect
Acala vs Concordium Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acala has no data, while Concordium Nakamoto Coefficient is 7
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
Acala has no data, while Concordium has 79 validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
Acala has no data, while Concordium stake is $58.09M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Acala has no data, while Concordium is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Acala has no data, while Concordium governance is council
Data from Chainspect
Acala vs Concordium Developer Activity
Developers
Acala has no data, while Concordium has 193 developers
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Acala has no data, while Concordium has 64,281 commits
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Acala has no data, while Concordium has 66 repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Acala has no data, while Concordium has 1,051 stars
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Acala has no data, while Concordium has 251 watchers
Data from Chainspect
Acala vs Concordium Financials New
Chain Revenue
Acala has no data, while Concordium chain revenue is $41.28
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Acala has no data, while Concordium average transaction fee is $0.01296
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Acala has no data, while Concordium market cap is $79.76M
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Acala has no data, while Concordium FDV is $95.56M
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Acala has no data, while Concordium Market Cap to FDV ratio is 83.47%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Acala has no data, while Concordium price is $0.006661
Data from Chainspect
Other Comparisons
Acala Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Acala
Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.
About Concordium
Concordium is a public Layer 1 blockchain platform designed for security, privacy, and scalability. Concordium was among the first to mandate identity verification at the blockchain consensus level while integrating zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs) for selective disclosure. Launched on Mainnet in 2021, it embeds encrypted identity into every transaction at the protocol level, enabling accountability while preserving user confidentiality.
Its native cryptocurrency, CCD, powers the ecosystem, facilitating transaction fees, staking, voting, node operator rewards, and serving as collateral in Concordium's DeFi landscape.
The newly appointed CEO and Executive Management team have revealed a focused strategic direction to double down on PayFi, enabling stablecoin issuers, financial institutions, and payment providers to accelerate real-world adoption. With stablecoin settlement volumes projected to reach $300 billion per day by 2025, Concordium delivers an enterprise-ready blockchain infrastructure uniquely suited for secure, programmable money solutions, as well as compliance as required by new regulatory frameworks.