Zephyr vs Polygon
Zephyr vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon TPS is 34.35 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume (1H)
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 124K txns
Block Time (1H)
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Total Transactions
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon has 5.64B total transactions
Launch Date
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Zephyr vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon stake is $869.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Zephyr vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon has 1,654 developers
Repos
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon has 148 repos
Commits
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon has 61,429 commits
Stars
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon has 9,116 stars
Watchers
Zephyr has no data, while Polygon has 1,808 watchers
Other Comparisons
Zephyr Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Zephyr
The untraceable over-collateralized stablecoin protocol.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.