Uomi vs Polygon
Uomi vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Uomi has no data, while Polygon TPS is 38.99 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Uomi has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Uomi has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume (1H)
Uomi has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 140K txns
Block Time (1H)
Uomi has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Uomi has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Uomi has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Total Transactions
Uomi has no data, while Polygon has 5.64B total transactions
Launch Date
Uomi has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Uomi vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Uomi has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Uomi has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Uomi has no data, while Polygon stake is $869.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Uomi has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Uomi has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Uomi vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Uomi has no data, while Polygon has 1,654 developers
Repos
Uomi has no data, while Polygon has 148 repos
Commits
Uomi has no data, while Polygon has 61,429 commits
Stars
Uomi has no data, while Polygon has 9,116 stars
Watchers
Uomi has no data, while Polygon has 1,808 watchers
Other Comparisons
Uomi Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Uomi
UOMI is the first Layer 1 built for secure AI computation and unstoppable agents that think, act, trade, and evolve, without human input.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.