NeuroWeb vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 31.35 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,105 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 112,866 txns
Block Time
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
NeuroWeb vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum nakamoto coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
NeuroWeb and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
NeuroWeb has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
NeuroWeb Comparisons
About Blockchains
About NeuroWeb
NeuroWeb Network is a decentralized Artificial Intelligence blockchain designed to incentivise knowledge creation, connectivity and sharing through Knowledge Mining.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.