Fantom vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Fantom TPS is 97.47% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Fantom max TPS is 86.7% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Fantom max theoretical TPS is 96.3% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Fantom transaction volume is 97.47% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Fantom block time is 7.27X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Fantom finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Fantom is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Fantom was launched 2 years before Arbitrum
Fantom vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Fantom Nakamoto Coefficient is 2X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Fantom has 14X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Fantom stake is $23.56M, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Fantom is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Fantom and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Fantom vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Fantom Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Fantom
Fantom is a high-performance, scalable, and secure smart contract platform engineered to surpass the constraints of preceding blockchain platforms. Operating as a permissionless, decentralized, and open-source network, Fantom leverages Lachesis, its asynchronous Byzantine Fault Tolerance (aBFT) consensus mechanism. This innovative approach enables Fantom to achieve remarkable speed and affordability compared to older technologies while maintaining exceptional security standards.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.