Bifrost vs Polygon
Bifrost vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon TPS is 30.24 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 108,854 txns
Block Time
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.16s
Finality
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Bifrost vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon stake is $902.7M
Consensus Mechanism
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Bifrost vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon has 1,653 developers
Repos
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon has 148 repos
Commits
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon has 61,384 commits
Stars
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon has 9,099 stars
Watchers
Bifrost has no data, while Polygon has 1,802 watchers
Other Comparisons
Bifrost Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Bifrost
Bifrost is a liquid staking appchain tailored for all blockchains, utilizing decentralized cross-chain interoperability to empower users to earn staking rewards and DeFi yields with flexibility, liquidity, and high security across multiple chains.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.