Avail vs Polygon
Avail vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Avail has no data, while Polygon TPS is 50.18 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Avail has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Avail has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume (1H)
Avail has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 181K txns
Block Time (1H)
Avail has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Avail has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Avail has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Total Transactions
Avail has no data, while Polygon has 5.64B total transactions
Launch Date
Avail has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Avail vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Avail has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 5
Validators/Miners
Avail has no data, while Polygon has 104 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Avail has no data, while Polygon stake is $850.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Avail has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Avail has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Avail vs Polygon Developer Activity New
Developers
Avail has no data, while Polygon has 1,654 developers
Repos
Avail has no data, while Polygon has 148 repos
Commits
Avail has no data, while Polygon has 61,435 commits
Stars
Avail has no data, while Polygon has 9,187 stars
Watchers
Avail has no data, while Polygon has 1,876 watchers
Other Comparisons
Avail Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Avail
Avail is a horizontally scalable, trust-minimized infrastructure network enabling seamless cross-chain interaction, transaction validation, and native liquidity interoperability.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.