Ascendia vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Ascendia TPS is 99.21% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Ascendia max TPS is 99.71% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Ascendia max theoretical TPS is 99.22% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Ascendia transaction volume is 99.21% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Block Time
Ascendia block time is 22X longer than Arbitrum block time
Finality
Ascendia finality is 81.88% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Type
Ascendia is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Ascendia was launched 2 years before Arbitrum
Ascendia vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Ascendia Nakamoto Coefficient is 6X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Ascendia has 49X more validators than Arbitrum
Stake
Ascendia stake is $59.92K, while Arbitrum has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Ascendia is PoS, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Ascendia and Arbitrum governance are both on-chain
Ascendia vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Ascendia Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Ascendia
Ascendia is a sovereign Layer 1 blockchain designed for on-chain AI agents. Agents that move with ease, act with purpose, and evolve by design. No gatekeepers. No complexity. Just seamless autonomy at your fingertips.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.