Apertum vs Polygon
Apertum vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Apertum has no data, while Polygon TPS is 47.13 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Apertum has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Apertum has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Apertum has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 169,683 txns
Block Time
Apertum has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
Apertum has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
Apertum has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Apertum has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
Apertum vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Apertum has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
Apertum has no data, while Polygon has 105 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Apertum has no data, while Polygon stake is $809.8M
Consensus Mechanism
Apertum has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Apertum has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
Apertum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Apertum
Apertum distinguishes itself with a unique combination of features designed for modern technology. Unlike Bitcoin's energy-intensive Proof of Work (PoW) and Ethereum's evolving scalability solutions, Apertum operates as a subnet of the Avalanche blockchain, providing high scalability and fast transactions. Its virtual mining protocol eliminates the need for physical hardware, making mining accessible to everyone. Additionally, its deflationary mechanism burns up to 50% of transaction fees, ensuring long-term value growth while maintaining fairness and transparency.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.