Gnosis Chain vs Litentry
Gnosis Chain vs Litentry Scalability
Real-time TPS
Gnosis Chain TPS is 2.6 tx/s, while Litentry has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Gnosis Chain max TPS is 80.9 tx/s, while Litentry has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Gnosis Chain max theoretical TPS is 161.9 tx/s, while Litentry has no data
Transaction Volume
Gnosis Chain transaction volume is 9,366 txns, while Litentry has no data
Block Time
Gnosis Chain block time is 5.26s, while Litentry has no data
Finality
Gnosis Chain finality is 2m 40s, while Litentry has no data
Type
Gnosis Chain is a sidechain, while Litentry has no data
Launch Date
Gnosis Chain was launched on Oct 8, 2018, while the Litentry has no data
Gnosis Chain vs Litentry Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Gnosis Chain and Litentry have no data
Validators/Miners
Gnosis Chain has 312,700 validators, while Litentry has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Gnosis Chain stake is $51.9M, while Litentry has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Gnosis Chain is PoS, while Litentry has no data
Governance
Gnosis Chain governance is multisig, while Litentry has no data
Gnosis Chain vs Litentry Developer Activity New
Developers
Gnosis Chain has 185 developers, while Litentry has no data
Repos
Gnosis Chain has 60 repos, while Litentry has no data
Commits
Gnosis Chain has 44,954 commits, while Litentry has no data
Stars
Gnosis Chain has 285 stars, while Litentry has no data
Watchers
Gnosis Chain has 137 watchers, while Litentry has no data
Other Comparisons
Gnosis Chain Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Gnosis Chain
Gnosis Chain operates as an execution-layer Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) chain, utilizing the xDAI stablecoin for transactions and fee payments. Its security is ensured by the Gnosis Beacon Chain (GBC), which employs a Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism akin to Cardano and Solana. Users stake GNO tokens to participate in transaction validation, earning additional GNO rewards for contributing to network security.
About Litentry
Litentry is a Decentralized Identity Aggregation protocol across multiple networks. It features a DID indexing mechanism and a Substrate-based credit computation network. The protocol provides a decentralized, interoperable identity aggregation service that mitigates the difficulty of resolving agnostic DID mechanisms.