Compare eCash vs Arbitrum

eCash TPS is 99.74% lower than Arbitrum TPS

0.03 tx/s

12.93 tx/s

eCash max TPS is 98.46% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

31.24 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.13% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

52.43 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

eCash transaction volume is 99.82% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

82 txns

46.5K txns

eCash block time is 1,393X longer than Arbitrum block time

5m 51s

252ms

eCash finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality

0s

13m 48s

eCash has 99.62% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

8.7M txns

2.35B txns

eCash was launched 10 months before Arbitrum

Nov 15, 2020

Aug 31, 2021

eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

4

1

eCash has 34X more miners than Arbitrum has validators

34

1

eCash hashrate is 0.0154 EH/s, while Arbitrum has no data

0.0154 EH/s

—

eCash is PoW, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Work (PoW)

Rollup (Optimistic)

eCash council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

eCash has 60.51% fewer developers than Arbitrum

974

2,467

eCash has 81.08% fewer commits than Arbitrum

38,082

201,294

eCash has 96.96% fewer repos than Arbitrum

4

132

eCash has 87.35% fewer stars than Arbitrum

1,370

10,831

eCash has 89.54% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

153

1,464

eCash on-chain revenue is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

$0.000000002116

$20.93K

eCash average transaction fee is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

$0.0000000000006263

$0.01089

eCash market cap is 84.28% lower than Arbitrum market cap

$149.3M

$949.8M

eCash FDV is 89.02% lower than Arbitrum FDV

$156.1M

$1.422B

eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.43X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio

95.63%

66.78%

eCash price is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum price

$0.000007432

$0.1422