eCash vs Arbitrum

eCash vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS

Chainspect

eCash TPS is 99.88% lower than Arbitrum TPS

eCash logo
0.04 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
36.93 tx/s

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Chainspect

eCash max TPS is 97.17% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

eCash logo
31.24 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
1,105 tx/s

Max Theoretical TPS

Chainspect

eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.86% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

eCash logo
52.43 tx/s
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Transaction Volume

Chainspect

eCash transaction volume is 99.88% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

eCash logo
155 txns
Arbitrum logo
132,957 txns

Block Time

Chainspect

eCash block time is 2,589X longer than Arbitrum block time

eCash logo
10m 45s
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Finality

Chainspect

eCash finality is 27.53% shorter than Arbitrum finality

eCash logo
10m
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Type

Chainspect

eCash is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

eCash logo
Layer 1 blockchain
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Launch Date

Chainspect

eCash was launched 10 months before Arbitrum

eCash logo
Nov 15, 2020
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

eCash vs Arbitrum Decentralization New

Nakamoto Coefficient

Chainspect

eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 2X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

eCash logo
2
Arbitrum logo
1

Validators/Miners

Chainspect

eCash has 13X more miners than Arbitrum has validators

eCash logo
13
Arbitrum logo
1

Stake/Hashrate

Chainspect

eCash hashrate is 0.085 EH/s, while Arbitrum has no data

eCash logo
0.085 EH/s
Arbitrum logo

Consensus Mechanism

Chainspect

eCash is PoW, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

eCash logo
Proof of Work (PoW)
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Governance

Chainspect

eCash council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

eCash logo
Council
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

eCash vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About eCash

eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

eCash Socials

Arbitrum Socials