Compare eCash vs Arbitrum

eCash TPS is 99.74% lower than Arbitrum TPS

0.03 tx/s

13.38 tx/s

eCash max TPS is 98.46% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

31.24 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.13% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

52.43 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

eCash transaction volume is 99.85% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

71 txns

48.2K txns

eCash block time is 1,228X longer than Arbitrum block time

5m 42s

278ms

eCash finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality

0s

13m 48s

eCash has 99.63% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

8.78M txns

2.38B txns

eCash was launched 10 months before Arbitrum

Nov 15, 2020

Aug 31, 2021

eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

4

1

eCash has 37X more miners than Arbitrum has validators

37

1

eCash hashrate is 0.0312 EH/s, while Arbitrum has no data

0.0312 EH/s

—

eCash is PoW, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Work (PoW)

Rollup (Optimistic)

eCash council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

eCash has 60.58% fewer developers than Arbitrum

977

2,479

eCash has 82.53% fewer commits than Arbitrum

38,219

218,814

eCash has 96.99% fewer repos than Arbitrum

4

133

eCash has 87.37% fewer stars than Arbitrum

1,370

10,852

eCash has 89.67% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

151

1,463

eCash on-chain revenue is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

$0.000000001463

$16.43K

eCash average transaction fee is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

$0.0000000000005167

$0.01619

eCash market cap is 88.13% lower than Arbitrum market cap

$162.3M

$1.368B

eCash FDV is 91.58% lower than Arbitrum FDV

$169.7M

$2.016B

eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.41X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio

95.68%

67.86%

eCash price is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum price

$0.000008079

$0.2016