Compare eCash vs Arbitrum
Open in ChatGPTeCash vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
eCash TPS is 99.42% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 98.46% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.13% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
eCash transaction volume is 99.45% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
eCash block time is 1,526X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
eCash finality is 27.53% shorter than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
eCash is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
eCash has 99.61% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
eCash was launched 10 months before Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 4X higher than Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
eCash has 34X more miners than Arbitrum has validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
eCash hashrate is 0.0151 EH/s, while Arbitrum has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
eCash is PoW, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
eCash council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
eCash has 60.75% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
eCash has 81.04% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
eCash has 96.89% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
eCash has 87.36% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
eCash has 89.74% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
eCash chain revenue is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
eCash average transaction fee is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
eCash market cap is 82.59% lower than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
eCash FDV is 88.77% lower than Arbitrum FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.55X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
eCash price is 99.99% lower than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Arbitrum Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.