Compare eCash vs Arbitrum

eCash TPS is 99.75% lower than Arbitrum TPS

0.02 tx/s

9.54 tx/s

eCash max TPS is 98.47% lower than Arbitrum max TPS

31.24 tx/s

2,036 tx/s

eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.14% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS

52.43 tx/s

6,095 tx/s

eCash transaction volume is 99.82% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume

63 txns

34.3K txns

eCash block time is 1,474X longer than Arbitrum block time

7m 27s

303ms

eCash finality is 100% shorter than Arbitrum finality

0s

13m 48s

eCash has 99.63% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum

8.83M txns

2.41B txns

eCash was launched 10 months before Arbitrum

Nov 15, 2020

Aug 31, 2021

eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

eCash has 36X more miners than Arbitrum has validators

36

1

eCash hashrate is 0.0528 EH/s, while Arbitrum has no data

0.0528 EH/s

—

eCash is PoW, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Work (PoW)

Rollup (Optimistic)

eCash council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance

Council

On-chain

eCash has 60.62% fewer developers than Arbitrum

979

2,486

eCash has 82.53% fewer commits than Arbitrum

38,355

219,593

eCash has 96.99% fewer repos than Arbitrum

4

133

eCash has 87.35% fewer stars than Arbitrum

1,373

10,857

eCash has 89.64% fewer watchers than Arbitrum

151

1,457

eCash on-chain revenue is 100% lower than Arbitrum on-chain revenue

$0.00000000147

$19.4K

eCash average transaction fee is 100% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee

$0.00000000000043

$0.0153

eCash market cap is 88.31% lower than Arbitrum market cap

$136M

$1.16B

eCash FDV is 91.58% lower than Arbitrum FDV

$142M

$1.69B

eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.39X higher than Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio

95.72%

68.92%

eCash price is 100% lower than Arbitrum price

$0.00000677

$0.1688