Real-time TPS
eCash TPS is 99.71% less than Arbitrum TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 97.17% less than Arbitrum max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.91% less than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Total Transactions
eCash total txns is 99.71% less than Arbitrum total txns
Block Time
eCash block time is 1,959X more than Arbitrum block time
Finality
eCash finality is 39.58% less than Arbitrum finality
Type
eCash is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Governance
eCash council governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Launch Date
eCash was launched 10 months before Arbitrum
eCash vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.