Compare Arbitrum vs Flow
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs Flow Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 9.79X higher than Flow TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 8.7X higher than Flow max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 1.56X higher than Flow max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 9.79X higher than Flow transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 68.81% shorter than Flow block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 83X longer than Flow finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Flow is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Arbitrum has 2.01X more total transactions than Flow
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year after Flow
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Flow Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 87.5% lower than Flow Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.63% fewer validators than Flow
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Flow stake is $147.4M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Flow is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Flow off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Flow Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 3.54X more developers than Flow
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 29.12% fewer repos than Flow
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 1.25X more commits than Flow
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 2.21X more stars than Flow
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 38.77% fewer watchers than Flow
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Flow Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 19,723X higher than Flow chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 2,701X higher than Flow average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 3.18X higher than Flow market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 5.66X higher than Flow FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 43.81% lower than Flow Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 8% lower than Flow price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Flow Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Flow
Flow is a layer one blockchain designed from the ground up for consumer apps and the digital assets that power them. The network runs on a Proof of Stake consensus mechanism with a unique "multi-role" architecture that solves the blockchain trilemma, balancing scalability, efficiency, and cost.
FLOW ($FLOW) is the native utility token that is used for:
- Fees for processing transactions and storing data.
- Buying, selling, and trading assets on Flow
- Staking and delegating to secure the network
Flow tools include:
- Cadence, a purpose-built smart contract programming language designed for consumer-grade applications
- Full EVM equivalence, allowing anything from Ethereum to work on Flow
- Protocol-level account abstraction and mobile support for onboarding new users
- Cross-chain interoperability with the wider web3 ecosystem
- Developer hub with comprehensive documentation and tools