Trac Network vs Arbitrum

Trac Network vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 34.6 tx/s

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
34.6 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 125K txns

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
125K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Neither Trac Network nor Arbitrum have data for total transactions

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Trac Network vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Trac Network and Arbitrum have no data

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Trac Network vs Arbitrum Developer Activity New

Developers

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,306 developers

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
2,306

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 126 repos

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
126

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 184,889 commits

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
184,889

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,308 stars

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
10,308

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Trac Network has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,714 watchers

Trac Network logo
Arbitrum logo
1,714

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Trac Network

Trac Network — unlike traditional blockchains — does not utilize blocks to process transactions. Instead it operates in favor of a constant stream of transactions that are peer-to-peer-validated and settled on decentralized ledgers. The topology of Trac Network allows for near-instant transaction settlement and a better user-experience. Trac Network uses DAGs as well as distributed clocks to maintain linearized and causal order of network messages.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Trac Network Socials

Arbitrum Socials