Compare Scroll vs Arbitrum
Scroll vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Scroll TPS is 97.39% lower than Arbitrum TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Scroll max TPS is 90.67% lower than Arbitrum max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Scroll max theoretical TPS is 99.65% lower than Arbitrum max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Scroll transaction volume is 97.39% lower than Arbitrum transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Scroll block time is 6.12X longer than Arbitrum block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Scroll finality is 14X longer than Arbitrum finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Scroll and Arbitrum are both layer 2 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Scroll has 92.54% fewer total transactions than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Scroll was launched 2 years after Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Arbitrum Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Scroll Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Scroll and Arbitrum have the same amount of validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Scroll and Arbitrum have no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Scroll is Rollup (ZK), while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Scroll multisig governance is worse than Arbitrum on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Arbitrum Developer Activity
Developers
Scroll has 88.39% fewer developers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Scroll has 42.18% fewer repos than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Scroll has 93.1% fewer commits than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Scroll has 51.93% fewer stars than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Scroll has 54.1% fewer watchers than Arbitrum
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Arbitrum Financials New
Chain Revenue
Scroll chain revenue is 97.83% lower than Arbitrum chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Scroll average transaction fee is 2.75% lower than Arbitrum average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Price
Scroll price is 42.8% lower than Arbitrum price
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Scroll market cap is 98.02% lower than Arbitrum market cap
Data from Chainspect
Scroll vs Arbitrum Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Scroll Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Scroll
Scroll, a Layer 2 Ethereum network, aims to simplify scaling solutions for projects utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Its primary mechanism, zkEVM, integrates zero-knowledge proofs with the EVM, enabling rapid Ethereum transaction confirmation without the need to store and transfer additional transaction data. Scroll aims to establish a universal network that grants developers a user experience and security level akin to Ethereum while surpassing Ethereum in throughput, verification speed, and gas fee affordability
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.