Scroll vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Scroll TPS is 98.38% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Scroll max TPS is 70.49% lower than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Scroll max theoretical TPS is 80.95% lower than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Scroll transaction volume is 98.38% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Scroll block time is 1.12X longer than Polygon block time
Finality
Scroll finality is 2,314X longer than Polygon finality
Type
Scroll is a layer 2 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Scroll was launched 3 years after Polygon
Scroll vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Scroll Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Scroll has 99.02% fewer validators than Polygon
Stake
Scroll has no data, while Polygon stake is 3.505B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
Scroll is Rollup (ZK), while Polygon is PoS
Governance
Scroll multisig governance is worse than Polygon off-chain governance
Scroll vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Scroll Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Scroll
Scroll, a Layer 2 Ethereum network, aims to simplify scaling solutions for projects utilizing the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM). Its primary mechanism, zkEVM, integrates zero-knowledge proofs with the EVM, enabling rapid Ethereum transaction confirmation without the need to store and transfer additional transaction data. Scroll aims to establish a universal network that grants developers a user experience and security level akin to Ethereum while surpassing Ethereum in throughput, verification speed, and gas fee affordability
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.